Building regional expertise in community-centered climate adaptation
Bringing Technical Expertise to You
Join us for Building Community Expertise: The NY/NJ USACE HATS Teach-In, a flood infrastructure teach-in to better understand the US Army Corps of Engineers’ proposed plan for flood protection in the New York and New Jersey region. This day-long event will feature presentations and live Q+A sessions with Architects, Landscape Architects, Urban Designers, Academics, Coastal Engineers, Oceanographers, and other experts who can help us all understand the USACE HATS preferred plan.
This event builds on the work of over 55 community organizations who identified their aspirations for coastal flood infrastructure, and submitted questions that they want experts to address.
To view the guiding principles co-developed by the community organizations and confirmed speakers, submit additional questions, or learn more more about the USACE process, check back here.
January 25th, 2022, 9AM
Virtual – Zoom
AIA CEU Credits will be given if your AIA number is submitted to email@example.com and you attend this event.
A full list of speaker bios can be found HERE.
9:00 AM | SESSION 1: Welcome
- Amy Chester, Rebuild by Design
9:15 AM | SESSION 2: Climate risks in the region, the Army Corps proposal & process
- Bernice Rosenzweig, Sarah Lawrence College
- Colonel Matthew Luzzatto and other USACE representatives
- Kate Boicourt, Environmental Defense Fund
Q & A MODERATOR: KATIE GRAZIANO, NEW YORK SEA GRANT
11:15 AM | SESSION 3: Functionality of the proposed flood measures, multi-hazard and multi-benefit design, and examples from other cities
- Edgar Westerhof, Arcadis
- Justine Shapiro-Kline, One Architecture & Urbanism
- Luce Bassetti, Jacobs
Q & A MODERATOR: AMY CHESTER, REBUILD BY DESIGN
12:30 | SESSION 4: Leveraging nature and mitigating potential threats to water quality
- Pippa Brashear, SCAPE Landscape Architecture
- Phil Orton, Stevens Institute of Technology
Q & A MODERATOR: TERRI CARTA, JAMAICA BAY ROCKAWAY PARKS CONSERVANCY
2:00 | SESSION 5: The effects of the USACE proposal on the region’s critical infrastructure and long-term planning
- Nick Angarone, NJ Department of Environmental Protection
- Matthew Chlebus, NY Department of Environmental Conservation
- Cherry Mui, NYC Mayor’s Office of Climate and Environmental Justice
Q & A MODERATOR: CALEB STRATTON, CITY OF HOBOKEN
3:30 | SESSION 6: Potential impacts of the USACE proposal on Environmental Justice communities and housing equity
- Anthony Rogers-Wright, NY Lawyers for the Public Interest
- Hilary Ho, Regional Plan Association
- Johanna Lawton, Rebuild by Design
Q & A MODERATOR: TYLER TABA, WATERFRONT ALLIANCE
4:45 | SESSION 7: Hazard and risk assessment
- Maxwell Evans, Jupiter Intelligence
- Samantha Danchuk, APTIM
Q & A MODERATOR: KATE BOICOURT, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
5:30 | SESSION 8: Final Q+A with US Army Corp representatives
Q & A MODERATOR: AMY CHESTER, REBUILD BY DESIGN
GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE
On December 2nd, 2022 Rebuild by Design held a meeting with over 80 attendees, representing at least 56 organizations, to discuss their aspirations for large-scale, regional, flood protection. Rebuild by Design captured responses from the meeting and questionnaire, organized the responses into general categories and synthesized the shared ideas from each category to create principles.
The following principles for developing and implementing coastal infrastructure are derived from that process and should be applied to the USACE HATS process, and future climate adaptation projects and processes.
PROCESS FOR DEVELOPING COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Engagement: The USACE process must have thorough community input during each stage of the project – planning, design, and implementation – with a particular focus on individuals and businesses who will be impacted by flooding, environmental justice communities, and youth. There must be robust engagement opportunities that are accessible in location, language, and clarity of information.
Transparency: The USACE process must be transparent in communicating all risks, trade-offs, beneficiaries, decision rationale, timeline as well as how feedback will be incorporated into the process, design, and implementation. The USACE must provide timely and detailed responses to inquiries and feedback during and outside of the public comment period. The role of non-federal partners should be explained.
Education: Educate communities with localized data of flood risk for each area where there is a proposed intervention that incorporates sea level rise, pollution and contamination, and the connection to cascading effects (such as health, economic, transportation, other climate hazards, etc.)
Comprehensive: The approach should think big, be comprehensive, incorporate alternative options that include both structural and non structural solutions, be adaptable, prevent future climate challenges, align with existing or planned projects and serve the entire region.
Multi-hazard: Flood plans, projects, and measures must be comprehensive by addressing multiple climate and environmental hazards, including but not limited to heavy rainfall, sea level rise, heat, pollution, carbon mitigation, and CSO events, and shall be designed to provide co-benefits to the impacted communities.
Multi-Solutional: Where possible, flood adaptation measures must seek to address multiple needs of the community, including, but not limited to housing, pollution, food security, human services, and safety.
Workforce: The design, implementation, and maintenance of flood infrastructure measures must be coupled with investments in local workforce development.
Finance and Investment: Utilize traditional and non-traditional forms of finance that prioritize areas in greatest financial need, leverage the private sector, and support the long-term maintenance of flood infrastructure.
Efficacy: Provide robust evidence that the selected measures will work as designed.
JUSTICE AND EQUITY BUILT INTO THE PROJECT AND PROCESS
Equity: Flood infrastructure measures must prioritize the most socially vulnerable communities, namely environmental justice neighborhoods, low-income households, the elderly, climate migrants, and those who have been historically marginalized due to race and ethnicity.
Housing Affordability + Managed Retreat: All flood infrastructure plans must account for the impact of climate displacement on low-income communities to ensure every household is choices about their future to stay or to move away from the flood zone, by investing in retrofits for low-income households and creating affordable housing in low-risk areas. Limit housing in areas that do not have a long-term plan/infrastructure investment pipeline and ensure that zoning follows planned actions.
PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF NATURE
Prioritize Nature-based Solutions: Flood Infrastructure that prioritizes the use of nature-based solutions over hard infrastructure, where feasible, which could include daylighting streams, using parks as water collection, and other “living with water” measures. Where hard infrastructure is necessary, use nature-based solutions to complement the proposed measures.
Waterfront access: Flood infrastructure measures preserve existing and create or improve new access to the waterfront and shoreline open spaces, particularly in areas of greatest need.
Ecology: Flood infrastructure measures must not have adverse impacts on the ecology and wildlife, or contribute to CSO’s.
American Littoral Society
Bayswater Civic Association
Belle Harbor Property Owners Association
Broad Channel Civic Association and
Bronx Council for Environmental Quality
Bronx River Alliance
Canarsie Community Development Inc. (CCDI)
Climate Adaptation Partners
Coney Island Beautification Project
Friends of Cooper Park
Friends of Bushwick Inlet Park
Friends of Transmitter Park
Gowanus Canal Conservancy
Harlem River Working Group
Jamaica Bay Ecowatchers
Jamaica Bay-Rockaway Parks Conservancy
Long Island City Coalition (LICC)
Hunters Point Community Coalition (HPCC)
Lower Raritan Watershed Partnership
Metropolitan Storm-Surge Working Group
National Parks Conservation Association, Northeast Region
National Wildlife Federation
New York Disaster Interfaith Services (NYDIS)
New York League of Conservation Voters
New York Restoration Project
New York Sea Grant/Science and Resilience Institute at Jamaica Bay
North Brooklyn Pipeline Coalition
North Brooklyn Progressive Democrats
Hudson River Foundation
NYC Soil and Water District
NYNJ Harbor & Estuary Program
Regional Plan Association
Regional Ready Rockaway
South Bronx Unite
Storm-Surge Working Group
Surfrider Foundation Foundation NYC
The Municipal Art Society of New York
The Nature Conservancy
Trust for Public Land
WE ACT for Environmental Justice
Columbia University – Columbia Climate School Resilient Coastal Communities Project, Center for Resilient Cities and Landscapes, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
Monmouth University –Urban Coast Institute
Queens College/CUNY Graduate Center
Sarah Lawrence College
Stevens Institute of Tech
Community Boards + Government Agencies
Brooklyn Community Board 1
Bronx Community Board 8
Manhattan Community Board 2
Manhattan Community Board 4
Mayor’s Office of Climate and Environmental Justice
NJ DEP Division of Resilience
Queens Community Board 14
BACKGROUND ON THIS PROCESS
The United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) has recently indicated their recommendation from the NY-NJ Harbor and Tributaries Study study, a tentatively selected plan called “3B”. The USACE HATS preferred plan, though currently unfunded, can reshape our region for generations to come.
As the deadline to submit public comments is quickly approaching, we know that organizations throughout the region have technical questions about the plan.
To create a better understanding of aspects of the USACE proposal that will impact local communities, Rebuild by Design will build on the extraordinary work that has already occurred by the Environmental Defense Fund, Rise to Resilience, and many of the organizations who are working together to convene experts to provide the technical assistance to local community organizations to build capacity to make informed comments.
Rebuild’s approach includes two parts that will take place until the closure of the USACE comment period:
- Identify and align goals across community organizations, and understand where there are differences.
- Connect interdisciplinary technical experts with local organizations to build a better understanding of how the 3B proposal will impact the region, the City, and individual neighborhoods. Create additional learning opportunities for experts to help organizations develop their own comments within the USACE timeline.